Q195 vs Q215, Q235 and Q275 Steel vs Surface Finish: 1U 1C 1E 1D 1X 1G 2A 2H 2C 2D 2E 2B 2G 2P 2R 2Q
Ratings Comparison
Strength
Q195 vs Q215, Q235 and Q275 Steel
4/10
Surface Finish: 1U 1C 1E 1D 1X 1G 2A 2H 2C 2D 2E 2B 2G 2P 2R 2Q
5/10
Corrosion Resistance
Q195 vs Q215, Q235 and Q275 Steel
3/10
Surface Finish: 1U 1C 1E 1D 1X 1G 2A 2H 2C 2D 2E 2B 2G 2P 2R 2Q
3/10
Lightweight
Q195 vs Q215, Q235 and Q275 Steel
5/10
Surface Finish: 1U 1C 1E 1D 1X 1G 2A 2H 2C 2D 2E 2B 2G 2P 2R 2Q
5/10
Machinability
Q195 vs Q215, Q235 and Q275 Steel
6/10
Surface Finish: 1U 1C 1E 1D 1X 1G 2A 2H 2C 2D 2E 2B 2G 2P 2R 2Q
6/10
Cost Efficiency
Q195 vs Q215, Q235 and Q275 Steel
9/10
Surface Finish: 1U 1C 1E 1D 1X 1G 2A 2H 2C 2D 2E 2B 2G 2P 2R 2Q
9/10
Temperature Resistance
Q195 vs Q215, Q235 and Q275 Steel
7/10
Surface Finish: 1U 1C 1E 1D 1X 1G 2A 2H 2C 2D 2E 2B 2G 2P 2R 2Q
7/10
Properties Comparison
| Property | Q195 vs Q215, Q235 and Q275 Steel | Surface Finish: 1U 1C 1E 1D 1X 1G 2A 2H 2C 2D 2E 2B 2G 2P 2R 2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Metal Base | Steel | Steel |
| Tensile Strength | 315.0 MPa | — |
| Yield Strength | 195.0 MPa | — |
| Elongation | — | — |
| Hardness (Brinell) | — | — |
| Elastic Modulus | — | — |
| Density | — | — |
| Melting Point | — | — |
| Thermal Conductivity | — | — |
| Weldable | — | — |
| Heat Treatable | — | — |
| Magnetic | — | — |