AA 2017 Aluminum Alloy vs. AA 2060 Aluminum Alloy

Zusammenfassung

AA 2017 Aluminum Alloy and AA 2060 Aluminum Alloy are both aluminum alloys commonly used in engineering applications. 2017 Aluminum offers a tensile strength of 425 MPa compared to 2060 Aluminum's 498.5 MPa.

Key Differences

Bewertungsvergleich

Festigkeit

AA 2017 Aluminum Alloy 5/10
AA 2060 Aluminum Alloy 5/10

Korrosionsbeständigkeit

AA 2017 Aluminum Alloy 6/10
AA 2060 Aluminum Alloy 6/10

Leichtgewicht

AA 2017 Aluminum Alloy 9/10
AA 2060 Aluminum Alloy 9/10

Zerspanbarkeit

AA 2017 Aluminum Alloy 8/10
AA 2060 Aluminum Alloy 8/10

Kosteneffizienz

AA 2017 Aluminum Alloy 7/10
AA 2060 Aluminum Alloy 7/10

Temperaturbeständigkeit

AA 2017 Aluminum Alloy 4/10
AA 2060 Aluminum Alloy 4/10

Eigenschaftsvergleich

Property AA 2017 Aluminum Alloy AA 2060 Aluminum Alloy
Grundmetall Aluminum Aluminum
Zugfestigkeit 425.0 MPa 498.5 MPa
Streckgrenze 275.0 MPa 421.0 MPa
Bruchdehnung 23.8 % 14.2 %
Härte (Brinell)
Elastizitätsmodul
Dichte
Schmelzpunkt
Wärmeleitfähigkeit
Schweißbar
Wärmebehandelbar
Magnetisch

Wann AA 2017 Aluminum Alloy verwenden

Choose 2017 Aluminum when your application specifically requires this aluminum alloy's unique combination of properties and industry certifications.

Wann AA 2060 Aluminum Alloy verwenden

Choose 2060 Aluminum when your application specifically requires this aluminum alloy's unique combination of properties and industry certifications.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is stronger, 2017 or 2060?
2017 has a tensile strength of 425 MPa while 2060 reaches 498.5 MPa, making 2060 the stronger alloy in ultimate tensile terms. For yield strength, 2017 is rated at 275 MPa versus 421 MPa for 2060.
Does 2017 or 2060 have better corrosion resistance?
Both alloys share the same corrosion resistance rating of 6/10.
Is 2017 or 2060 easier to weld?
Weldability data is not available for both alloys. In terms of machinability, 2017 scores 8/10 and 2060 scores 8/10.
Which is more cost-effective, 2017 or 2060?
Both alloys are similarly priced with a cost rating of 7/10.
Can I use 2017 instead of 2060 for aerospace applications?
Strength ratings: 2017 5/10 vs 2060 5/10. Always validate substitution against your specific design codes and operating conditions.

Verwandte Vergleiche