AA 2017 Aluminum Alloy vs. AA 2198 Aluminum Alloy

Zusammenfassung

AA 2017 Aluminum Alloy and AA 2198 Aluminum Alloy are both aluminum alloys commonly used in engineering applications. 2017 Aluminum offers a tensile strength of 425 MPa compared to 2198 Aluminum's 157 MPa.

Key Differences

Bewertungsvergleich

Festigkeit

AA 2017 Aluminum Alloy 5/10
AA 2198 Aluminum Alloy 3/10

Korrosionsbeständigkeit

AA 2017 Aluminum Alloy 6/10
AA 2198 Aluminum Alloy 6/10

Leichtgewicht

AA 2017 Aluminum Alloy 9/10
AA 2198 Aluminum Alloy 9/10

Zerspanbarkeit

AA 2017 Aluminum Alloy 8/10
AA 2198 Aluminum Alloy 8/10

Kosteneffizienz

AA 2017 Aluminum Alloy 7/10
AA 2198 Aluminum Alloy 7/10

Temperaturbeständigkeit

AA 2017 Aluminum Alloy 4/10
AA 2198 Aluminum Alloy 4/10

Eigenschaftsvergleich

Property AA 2017 Aluminum Alloy AA 2198 Aluminum Alloy
Grundmetall Aluminum Aluminum
Zugfestigkeit 425.0 MPa 157.0 MPa
Streckgrenze 275.0 MPa 452.0 MPa
Bruchdehnung 23.8 %
Härte (Brinell)
Elastizitätsmodul
Dichte
Schmelzpunkt
Wärmeleitfähigkeit
Schweißbar
Wärmebehandelbar
Magnetisch

Wann AA 2017 Aluminum Alloy verwenden

Choose 2017 Aluminum when you need superior strength.

Wann AA 2198 Aluminum Alloy verwenden

Choose 2198 Aluminum when your application specifically requires this aluminum alloy's unique combination of properties and industry certifications.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is stronger, 2017 or 2198?
2017 has a tensile strength of 425 MPa while 2198 reaches 157 MPa, making 2017 the stronger alloy in ultimate tensile terms. For yield strength, 2017 is rated at 275 MPa versus 452 MPa for 2198.
Does 2017 or 2198 have better corrosion resistance?
Both alloys share the same corrosion resistance rating of 6/10.
Is 2017 or 2198 easier to weld?
Weldability data is not available for both alloys. In terms of machinability, 2017 scores 8/10 and 2198 scores 8/10.
Which is more cost-effective, 2017 or 2198?
Both alloys are similarly priced with a cost rating of 7/10.
Can I use 2017 instead of 2198 for aerospace applications?
Strength ratings: 2017 5/10 vs 2198 3/10. Always validate substitution against your specific design codes and operating conditions.

Verwandte Vergleiche