AA 7039 Aluminum Alloy vs AA 7050 Aluminum Alloy

Ringkasan

AA 7039 Aluminum Alloy and AA 7050 Aluminum Alloy are both aluminum alloys commonly used in engineering applications. 7039 Aluminum offers a tensile strength of 414 MPa compared to 7050 Aluminum's 5.2E+2 MPa.

Key Differences

Ratings Comparison

Strength

AA 7039 Aluminum Alloy 5/10
AA 7050 Aluminum Alloy 6/10

Corrosion Resistance

AA 7039 Aluminum Alloy 6/10
AA 7050 Aluminum Alloy 6/10

Lightweight

AA 7039 Aluminum Alloy 9/10
AA 7050 Aluminum Alloy 9/10

Machinability

AA 7039 Aluminum Alloy 8/10
AA 7050 Aluminum Alloy 8/10

Cost Efficiency

AA 7039 Aluminum Alloy 7/10
AA 7050 Aluminum Alloy 7/10

Temperature Resistance

AA 7039 Aluminum Alloy 4/10
AA 7050 Aluminum Alloy 4/10

Properties Comparison

Property AA 7039 Aluminum Alloy AA 7050 Aluminum Alloy
Metal Base Aluminum Aluminum
Tensile Strength 414.0 MPa 520.0 MPa
Yield Strength 328.0 MPa 464.5 MPa
Elongation 15.1 % 8.3 %
Hardness (Brinell)
Elastic Modulus
Density
Melting Point
Thermal Conductivity
Weldable
Heat Treatable
Magnetic

When to Use AA 7039 Aluminum Alloy

Choose 7039 Aluminum when your application specifically requires this aluminum alloy's unique combination of properties and industry certifications.

When to Use AA 7050 Aluminum Alloy

Choose 7050 Aluminum when you need superior strength.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is stronger, 7039 or 7050?
7039 has a tensile strength of 414 MPa while 7050 reaches 5.2E+2 MPa, making 7050 the stronger alloy in ultimate tensile terms. For yield strength, 7039 is rated at 328 MPa versus 464.5 MPa for 7050.
Does 7039 or 7050 have better corrosion resistance?
Both alloys share the same corrosion resistance rating of 6/10.
Is 7039 or 7050 easier to weld?
Weldability data is not available for both alloys. In terms of machinability, 7039 scores 8/10 and 7050 scores 8/10.
Which is more cost-effective, 7039 or 7050?
Both alloys are similarly priced with a cost rating of 7/10.
Can I use 7039 instead of 7050 for aerospace applications?
Strength ratings: 7039 5/10 vs 7050 6/10. Always validate substitution against your specific design codes and operating conditions.

Related Comparisons