AA 5182 Aluminum Alloy so với AA 6016 Aluminum Alloy

Tóm tắt

AA 5182 Aluminum Alloy and AA 6016 Aluminum Alloy are both aluminum alloys commonly used in engineering applications. 5182 Aluminum offers a tensile strength of 373 MPa compared to 6016 Aluminum's 184.5 MPa.

Key Differences

So sánh Xếp hạng

Độ bền

AA 5182 Aluminum Alloy 5/10
AA 6016 Aluminum Alloy 3/10

Khả năng chống ăn mòn

AA 5182 Aluminum Alloy 6/10
AA 6016 Aluminum Alloy 6/10

Nhẹ

AA 5182 Aluminum Alloy 9/10
AA 6016 Aluminum Alloy 9/10

Khả năng gia công

AA 5182 Aluminum Alloy 8/10
AA 6016 Aluminum Alloy 8/10

Hiệu quả Chi phí

AA 5182 Aluminum Alloy 7/10
AA 6016 Aluminum Alloy 7/10

Khả năng Chịu Nhiệt

AA 5182 Aluminum Alloy 4/10
AA 6016 Aluminum Alloy 4/10

So sánh Tính chất

Property AA 5182 Aluminum Alloy AA 6016 Aluminum Alloy
Kim loại cơ bản Aluminum Aluminum
Độ bền kéo 373.0 MPa 184.5 MPa
Giới hạn chảy 221.5 MPa 161.5 MPa
Độ giãn dài 17.5 %
Độ cứng (Brinell)
Mô đun Đàn hồi
Khối lượng riêng
Điểm Nóng chảy
Độ dẫn nhiệt
Có thể Hàn
Có thể Xử lý Nhiệt
Từ tính

Khi nào Sử dụng AA 5182 Aluminum Alloy

Choose 5182 Aluminum when you need superior strength.

Khi nào Sử dụng AA 6016 Aluminum Alloy

Choose 6016 Aluminum when your application specifically requires this aluminum alloy's unique combination of properties and industry certifications.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is stronger, 5182 or 6016?
5182 has a tensile strength of 373 MPa while 6016 reaches 184.5 MPa, making 5182 the stronger alloy in ultimate tensile terms. For yield strength, 5182 is rated at 221.5 MPa versus 161.5 MPa for 6016.
Does 5182 or 6016 have better corrosion resistance?
Both alloys share the same corrosion resistance rating of 6/10.
Is 5182 or 6016 easier to weld?
Weldability data is not available for both alloys. In terms of machinability, 5182 scores 8/10 and 6016 scores 8/10.
Which is more cost-effective, 5182 or 6016?
Both alloys are similarly priced with a cost rating of 7/10.
Can I use 5182 instead of 6016 for aerospace applications?
Strength ratings: 5182 5/10 vs 6016 3/10. Always validate substitution against your specific design codes and operating conditions.

So sánh liên quan