AA 2017 Aluminum Alloy vs AA 2195 Aluminum Alloy

Résumé

AA 2017 Aluminum Alloy and AA 2195 Aluminum Alloy are both aluminum alloys commonly used in engineering applications. 2017 Aluminum offers a tensile strength of 425 MPa compared to 2195 Aluminum's 572 MPa.

Key Differences

Comparaison des notations

Résistance

AA 2017 Aluminum Alloy 5/10
AA 2195 Aluminum Alloy 6/10

Résistance à la corrosion

AA 2017 Aluminum Alloy 6/10
AA 2195 Aluminum Alloy 6/10

Légèreté

AA 2017 Aluminum Alloy 9/10
AA 2195 Aluminum Alloy 9/10

Usinabilité

AA 2017 Aluminum Alloy 8/10
AA 2195 Aluminum Alloy 8/10

Efficacité des coûts

AA 2017 Aluminum Alloy 7/10
AA 2195 Aluminum Alloy 7/10

Résistance à la température

AA 2017 Aluminum Alloy 4/10
AA 2195 Aluminum Alloy 4/10

Comparaison des propriétés

Property AA 2017 Aluminum Alloy AA 2195 Aluminum Alloy
Métal de base Aluminum Aluminum
Résistance à la traction 425.0 MPa 572.0 MPa
Limite d'élasticité 275.0 MPa 522.0 MPa
Allongement 23.8 % 9.1 %
Dureté (Brinell)
Module d'élasticité
Densité
Point de fusion
Conductivité thermique
Soudable
Traitable thermiquement
Magnétique

Quand utiliser AA 2017 Aluminum Alloy

Choose 2017 Aluminum when your application specifically requires this aluminum alloy's unique combination of properties and industry certifications.

Quand utiliser AA 2195 Aluminum Alloy

Choose 2195 Aluminum when you need superior strength.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is stronger, 2017 or 2195?
2017 has a tensile strength of 425 MPa while 2195 reaches 572 MPa, making 2195 the stronger alloy in ultimate tensile terms. For yield strength, 2017 is rated at 275 MPa versus 522 MPa for 2195.
Does 2017 or 2195 have better corrosion resistance?
Both alloys share the same corrosion resistance rating of 6/10.
Is 2017 or 2195 easier to weld?
Weldability data is not available for both alloys. In terms of machinability, 2017 scores 8/10 and 2195 scores 8/10.
Which is more cost-effective, 2017 or 2195?
Both alloys are similarly priced with a cost rating of 7/10.
Can I use 2017 instead of 2195 for aerospace applications?
Strength ratings: 2017 5/10 vs 2195 6/10. Always validate substitution against your specific design codes and operating conditions.

Comparaisons associées