AA 2014 Aluminum Alloy vs AA 2198 Aluminum Alloy

Resumo

AA 2014 Aluminum Alloy and AA 2198 Aluminum Alloy are both aluminum alloys commonly used in engineering applications. 2014 Aluminum offers a tensile strength of 469 MPa compared to 2198 Aluminum's 157 MPa.

Key Differences

Comparação de classificações

Resistência

AA 2014 Aluminum Alloy 5/10
AA 2198 Aluminum Alloy 3/10

Resistência à corrosão

AA 2014 Aluminum Alloy 6/10
AA 2198 Aluminum Alloy 6/10

Leve

AA 2014 Aluminum Alloy 9/10
AA 2198 Aluminum Alloy 9/10

Maquinabilidade

AA 2014 Aluminum Alloy 8/10
AA 2198 Aluminum Alloy 8/10

Eficiência de custos

AA 2014 Aluminum Alloy 7/10
AA 2198 Aluminum Alloy 7/10

Resistência à temperatura

AA 2014 Aluminum Alloy 4/10
AA 2198 Aluminum Alloy 4/10

Comparação de propriedades

Property AA 2014 Aluminum Alloy AA 2198 Aluminum Alloy
Metal base Aluminum Aluminum
Resistência à tração 469.0 MPa 157.0 MPa
Limite de elasticidade 410.0 MPa 452.0 MPa
Alongamento 68.8 %
Dureza (Brinell)
Módulo elástico
Densidade
Ponto de fusão
Condutividade térmica
Soldável
Tratável termicamente
Magnético

Quando usar AA 2014 Aluminum Alloy

Choose 2014 Aluminum when you need superior strength.

Quando usar AA 2198 Aluminum Alloy

Choose 2198 Aluminum when your application specifically requires this aluminum alloy's unique combination of properties and industry certifications.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is stronger, 2014 or 2198?
2014 has a tensile strength of 469 MPa while 2198 reaches 157 MPa, making 2014 the stronger alloy in ultimate tensile terms. For yield strength, 2014 is rated at 4.1E+2 MPa versus 452 MPa for 2198.
Does 2014 or 2198 have better corrosion resistance?
Both alloys share the same corrosion resistance rating of 6/10.
Is 2014 or 2198 easier to weld?
Weldability data is not available for both alloys. In terms of machinability, 2014 scores 8/10 and 2198 scores 8/10.
Which is more cost-effective, 2014 or 2198?
Both alloys are similarly priced with a cost rating of 7/10.
Can I use 2014 instead of 2198 for aerospace applications?
Strength ratings: 2014 5/10 vs 2198 3/10. Always validate substitution against your specific design codes and operating conditions.

Comparações relacionadas